Связаться с
обращайтесь к нам по любым вопросам
решение

Введите название вашей компании.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Укажите свой номер телефона, чтобы мы могли быстро ответить.
Укажите свой номер телефона, чтобы мы могли быстро ответить.
Интересный товар
Выберите интересующий вас товар.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Пожалуйста, сообщите нам любую дополнительную информацию или задайте интересующие вас вопросы.

Industrial Evaporation System

Double Effect Evaporator for Industrial Wastewater & Process Concentration

Memva designs double effect evaporator systems that reuse vapor from the first effect as the heating source for the second effect, reducing fresh-steam demand compared with a single-effect arrangement. System configuration is selected from the actual feed composition, evaporation duty, scaling tendency, corrosion risk and utility conditions.

  • Two-stage vapor heat reuse for lower live-steam demand
  • Falling-film or forced-circulation configurations selected by feed behavior
  • Material selection based on chloride, acidity, temperature and corrosion risk
  • Suitable for selected wastewater, RO brine, chemical and process concentration duties
Design Basis Feed chemistry + evaporation duty + target concentrate
Heat Reuse First-effect vapor is reused in the second effect
System Selection Compared with single-effect, multi-effect and MVC/MVR options
Memva industrial double effect evaporator system with vessels, piping, pumps and control cabinets

Technology Fit

Is a Double Effect Evaporator the Right Choice for Your Project?

A double-effect system is not automatically the best evaporator for every feed. The most economical choice depends on feed chemistry, operating hours, available steam and electricity, required water recovery, fouling behavior and final concentrate target.

A double-effect system is worth evaluating when:

  • The process runs continuously or for long operating hours.
  • Live steam is available and steam cost is a significant operating expense.
  • The project needs more steam efficiency than a single-effect system.
  • The feed can be concentrated across two temperature and pressure levels.
  • You need a practical balance between capital cost and steam consumption.

Another evaporation route may be better when:

  • The duty is small, intermittent or highly batch-driven.
  • Electricity economics favor mechanical vapor recompression.
  • Very high solids, crystallization or severe scaling requires a specialized circulation design.
  • Temperature-sensitive products need a lower thermal history than the proposed two-effect arrangement can provide.
  • Site space, utilities or maintenance strategy favor a simpler or different system.

Working Principle

How a Double Effect Evaporator Works

The core idea is simple: instead of rejecting the vapor generated in the first evaporator, the system reuses that vapor to heat a second evaporator operating at a lower boiling pressure and temperature.

Feed Preparation

The feed is conditioned and introduced into the first effect. Pretreatment requirements depend on suspended solids, hardness, organics, pH and scaling risk.

First Effect

Live steam supplies heat to the first effect. Part of the water or solvent evaporates while the liquid becomes more concentrated.

Second Effect

Vapor from the first effect becomes the heating medium for the second effect, which operates at a lower pressure so evaporation can continue at a lower boiling temperature.

Condensate & Concentrate

Final vapor is condensed. The concentrated stream leaves the system for reuse, crystallization, disposal or downstream treatment according to the process target.

Performance note: Steam economy is project-specific. A two-effect design may target roughly 1.5–1.8 kg of water evaporation per kg of live steam under suitable conditions, but actual performance changes with boiling-point elevation, heat losses, fouling, feed temperature, product concentration and operating pressure. Final guarantees should come from the project heat-and-mass balance.

Технические параметры

Double Effect Evaporator Specifications & Configuration Options

Industrial evaporators should be sized from process data rather than from a generic catalog capacity. The table below shows the main variables Memva can evaluate during system design.

Design Item Typical Engineering Options What Determines the Selection
Evaporation duty Custom-engineered to required water removal / concentration duty Feed flow, inlet concentration, target concentration and operating hours
Evaporator circulation Falling film, forced circulation or application-specific arrangement Viscosity, suspended solids, crystallization and fouling tendency
Feed arrangement Forward feed, backward feed, parallel feed or mixed arrangement where suitable Boiling-point elevation, heat sensitivity, viscosity and pumping requirements
Строительные материалы SS316L, titanium or nickel-alloy options where required Chlorides, acids/alkalis, temperature, corrosion allowance and cleaning chemistry
Vapor-liquid separation Separator and demister configuration matched to vapor load Foaming tendency, entrainment risk and condensate-quality target
Автоматизация PLC + HMI with level, temperature, pressure and flow control Required automation level, data logging and plant integration
Vacuum / condenser Selected according to second-effect boiling temperature and condenser duty Cooling-water conditions, non-condensables and product temperature limit
Стратегия очистки Mechanical access and/or CIP strategy according to the process Scaling chemistry, organic fouling, solids and required cleaning frequency

Design Selection

Which Double Effect Evaporator Configuration Fits the Feed?

The heat-transfer surface and circulation method matter more than marketing labels. Selection should start with the physical behavior of the feed.

Falling Film

Often considered for relatively clean, pumpable feeds where short residence time and lower thermal exposure are useful.

Lower viscosity Heat-sensitive feeds Good distribution required

Forced Circulation

Often preferred when scaling, crystallization, higher solids or higher viscosity makes strong circulation and controlled boiling important.

High solids Scaling tendency Crystallizing feeds

Feed Arrangement & TVR

Forward, backward or other feed arrangements can be evaluated from temperature profile and viscosity. TVR may be considered when steam conditions and economics support additional vapor reuse.

Process-dependent Utility-dependent Custom thermal balance

Приложения

Double Effect Evaporator Applications

Memva's core industrial focus is wastewater concentration and water recovery. The same two-effect heat-reuse principle can also be applied to selected process-concentration duties after feed compatibility is reviewed.

High-Salinity Wastewater & RO Brine

Volume reduction and pre-concentration of high-TDS streams before crystallization, further evaporation or final ZLD treatment.

  • RO concentrate / reject
  • Industrial brine
  • Wastewater volume reduction

Chemical & Process Wastewater

Concentration of selected process streams where metallurgy, foaming, scaling and volatile components have been reviewed during engineering.

  • Chemical-process effluent
  • Selected salts and dissolved solids
  • Water-recovery applications

Process Concentration

Selected liquid concentration duties can use two-effect evaporation when the product is compatible with the required temperature profile and equipment materials.

  • Selected food/process liquids
  • Intermediate concentration
  • By-product recovery

Сравнение технологий

Double Effect vs Single Effect vs MVC/MVR Evaporator

Buyers usually need to compare lifecycle cost, not only equipment price. Use this table as a selection framework; final economics should be calculated from your actual steam price, electricity price, annual operating hours and evaporation duty.

Коэффициент отбора Однократный эффект Double Effect MVC / MVR
Energy reuse principle No second evaporation effect First-effect vapor heats the second effect Generated vapor is mechanically compressed and reused
Live-steam demand Typically highest of the three Lower than single effect under comparable duty Can greatly reduce steady-state fresh-steam demand; electricity becomes more important
Capital complexity Lowest Medium Higher due to compressor and associated controls
Control / maintenance Simpler Moderate More specialized rotating equipment and controls
Typical project fit Smaller or intermittent duties Continuous duties where steam savings justify the second effect Continuous duties where electricity economics and feed behavior support vapor recompression
Best way to decide Run a project-specific heat-and-mass balance and compare annual energy cost, cleaning frequency, maintenance, footprint and capital cost.

Not sure whether double effect or MVC/MVR is more economical?

Send your feed flow, TDS/solids, target concentration and local steam/electricity cost. Memva can compare suitable evaporation routes before equipment selection.

Send Process Data

Project Engineering

How We Size a Double Effect Evaporator

Reliable sizing starts with feed data. This section turns the page from a generic product description into an engineering inquiry page.

STEP 01

Проанализируйте ленту

Flow, TDS/solids, COD/organics, pH, chlorides, hardness, viscosity, suspended solids and volatile components.

STEP 02

Определите цель

Required evaporation rate, final concentration, condensate reuse target, discharge target or downstream crystallization duty.

STEP 03

Select the Configuration

Choose circulation type, feed arrangement, metallurgy, separator, vacuum system, condenser and cleaning strategy.

STEP 04

Compare Lifecycle Cost

Evaluate steam, electricity, cooling water, cleaning frequency, maintenance, footprint and annual operating hours.

Вопросы покупателей

Double Effect Evaporator FAQ

What is the main advantage of a double effect evaporator?

The first-effect vapor is reused as heat for the second effect. This can reduce live-steam consumption compared with a single-effect system, although the actual saving depends on the temperature profile, boiling-point elevation, heat losses and operating conditions.

What is the typical steam economy of a double effect evaporator?

A project may target approximately 1.5–1.8 kg of water evaporation per kg of live steam under suitable conditions. This should be treated as a design reference, not a universal guarantee. Final performance needs a heat-and-mass balance for the actual feed.

When should forced circulation be used?

Forced circulation is commonly evaluated for feeds with higher solids, viscosity, scaling or crystallization tendency, because circulation velocity and boiling location can be controlled more deliberately than in some film arrangements.

Can a double effect evaporator be used for high-salinity wastewater?

Yes, for suitable high-salinity streams. The design must account for salt composition, saturation limits, scaling, corrosion, foaming, suspended solids and the required final concentration. Pretreatment or a different evaporator configuration may be needed for difficult feeds.

How do I choose between double effect and MVC/MVR evaporation?

Compare the feed characteristics, evaporation load, operating hours, steam price, electricity price, maintenance strategy and site utilities. MVC/MVR can reduce dependence on live steam, while double effect systems can be attractive where steam is readily available and a simpler thermal configuration is preferred.

What information is required for a quotation?

Provide feed flow, composition or water analysis, TDS/solids, inlet temperature, target concentration, operating hours, available steam pressure, cooling-water conditions, electrical supply and any known scaling, corrosion or foaming issues.

Request a Proposal

Send Your Process Data for Double Effect Evaporator Selection

The fastest way to get a useful proposal is to share the feed and utility data below. If some values are unknown, send what you have and identify the missing items.

Useful information to include:
  • Feed flow: m³/day, m³/h or kg/h
  • TDS / total solids and main salt or chemical composition
  • COD, suspended solids, pH and chloride level if wastewater
  • Feed temperature and target concentrate / water recovery
  • Available steam pressure and local steam cost
  • Electricity price, cooling-water conditions and operating hours
  • Known scaling, foaming, corrosion or crystallization issues

Request an Engineering Proposal

Please include feed data in the message field where possible.

Пожалуйста, введите название вашей компании.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Пожалуйста, укажите отрасль, в которой работает ваша компания.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Пожалуйста, укажите имя контактного лица по данному вопросу.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Пожалуйста, укажите действующий номер телефона, по которому с вами можно связаться.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Укажите суточную производительность очистных сооружений (м³/сутки или в других единицах измерения).
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Перечислите основные загрязняющие вещества, содержащиеся в сточных водах, чтобы мы могли лучше понять ваши потребности.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Опишите требуемое качество воды после очистки.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Интересующее оборудование (отметьте все подходящие варианты)
Выберите все варианты оборудования для очистки сточных вод, которые вас интересуют.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Кратко опишите текущий статус проекта.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Пожалуйста, укажите предполагаемый диапазон бюджета для проекта.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Необязательно: здесь можно указать любую дополнительную информацию или конкретные пожелания.
Пожалуйста, подтвердите, что вы согласны с обработкой ваших данных в соответствии с изложенным выше.
Это поле является обязательным для заполнения.
Performance, material selection, energy consumption and final equipment configuration are confirmed only after reviewing project-specific feed and utility data.

Мемва является ведущей компанией в области очистки воды для нужд окружающей среды, объединяющей научно-исследовательские и опытно-конструкторские работы, проектирование, производство и эксплуатацию.
Мы специализируемся на системы очистки промышленных сточных вод и системы подачи чистой воды, предлагая индивидуальные решения в области нулевого сброса (ZLD) и повторного использования воды помочь клиентам обеспечить соблюдение экологических норм и вести деятельность в соответствии с принципами устойчивого развития.

Контакты

Электронная почта

jiangmou2024@gmail.com

Адрес

Дунгуань, провинция Гуандун, Китай

Пн — Сб

С 10:00 до 19:00 (воскресенье: закрыто)